🪐 A Questioner for the Survival of the Universe
📖 Reading to grasp the axis of history,
📜 Designing the future of civilization through policy,
🔭 Sowing seeds of thought that will endure even 100,000 years from now.

“The universe continues to expand, and so does my thinking within it. To be alive—this itself is my mission.”

“Welcome to a small planet for those who question life and civilization from a cosmic perspective, and for those who share the curiosity.”

12/28/2024

As noted in the previous essay, proving the infinity of space necessarily requires the existence of a Communicatable Universe. Through such a communicatable universe, we could approximate the size of the cosmos with maximum precision. I have chosen to classify this approach under the methodology of Revised-Normal Science, itself an extension of Post-Normal Science.

The connection between quantum entanglement—recognized in the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics—and the communicatable universe opens up the possibility of contact with civilizations more advanced than our own, as well as the transmission and computation of information regarding the infinity of space. If space is infinite, then machine civilizations that are easily replicable and replaceable must exist; these would be fully equipped with artificial intelligence. Establishing a link with such a civilization would make it possible to monitor the infinity of space with relative ease. This continuous monitoring of spatial infinity is, in fact, the reason mathematics can describe physics in an absolute sense.

In that scenario, the infinity of cosmic time—the entire history of the universe—would also be assured. The early universe could then be understood as a single event within an infinite temporal continuum of possibilities. The conclusion follows naturally: describing physics through mathematics is inherently correct, because the only intellectual framework capable of conceiving infinity is mathematics. Physics, in contrast, often regards mathematical infinity as a byproduct of error.

Drawing inspiration from Brian Greene’s observation in The Fabric of the Cosmos that M-Theory and cosmology are more likely to be validated through observation than through direct experimentation, I propose going a step further: that proof through communication is more effective than proof through observation. To fully explain M-Theory and cosmology would require energies sufficient to probe the Planck scale—something far beyond our present terrestrial capabilities. It would be more feasible to investigate such conditions (e.g., those of the early universe) through observation. Better still, however, would be to locate and communicate with a civilization that has already conducted such explorations.


The Cosmic Thinker’s and Essayist’s Notebook에서 더 알아보기

구독을 신청하면 최신 게시물을 이메일로 받아볼 수 있습니다.

Posted in

댓글 남기기

The Cosmic Thinker’s and Essayist’s Notebook에서 더 알아보기

지금 구독하여 계속 읽고 전체 아카이브에 액세스하세요.

계속 읽기